Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 F.2d 163 - Grant v. Guernsey

Grant v. Guernsey’s Empirical Analysis

63 F.2d 163 · 1933

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
3
states following
June 1970
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently June 1970 · most notably Wall v. Hudspeth (1940), Strand v. Schmittroth (1957)

26 federal appellate · 5 district · 6 state decisions

24019331940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ponzi v. Fessenden · Taylor v. Taintor · Mackenzie v. Barrett · Adamy v. Parkhurst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was a direct interference with federal jurisdiction, and a violation of the rule of comity between federal and state courts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.