Westfeldt v. Commissioner

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1933.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1933-03-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1933

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Westfeldt v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1933-03-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Monte M. Lemann and Nicholas Callan, both of New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

¶2G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and John MacC. Hudson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Frank M. Thompson, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

¶3Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.

¶4SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

¶5The question in this case is identical with that in George G. Westfeldt v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C. C. A.) 63 F.(2d) 882, this day decided. Upon the authority of that ease, the petition for review of the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in this case is denied.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Panel

Nathan Philemon Bryan
Circuit Judge
Rufus Edward Foster
Circuit Judge
Samuel Hale Sibley
Circuit Judge

Counsel

Monte M. Lemann and Nicholas Callan, both of New Orleans, La., for petitioner.

G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and John MacC. Hudson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Frank M. Thompson, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.