Correll v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
63 F.3d 1279 · 1995
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably O'Dell III v. Jd Netherland J S III O'Dell III (1996), Howard v. Moore (1997)
36 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Kotteakos v. United States · Edwards v. Arizona · Brecht v. Abrahamson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is a complete dearth of information in the record concerning the circumstances surrounding Correll’s decision to submit to the polygraph examination or any further information pertaining to the timing or events surrounding the disclosure of the results. Correll simply failed to develop these facts during the state court proceedings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cooper v. Taylor · Sherman v. Smith“obtained in technical violation of Miranda,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.