Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 F.3d 1478 - United States v. Baker

United States v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

63 F.3d 1478 · 1995

Citation profile

129
cited by 129 later decisions
4
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

63 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably United States v. Nelson (1998), United States v. White (1997)

63 federal appellate · 5 district · 7 state decisions

5201995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2341 · 18 U.S.C. § 2342 · 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 22 U.S.C. § 1934

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Barker v. Wingo · Missouri v. Hunter · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Cheek v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nder Washington law, mere possession of unstamped cigarettes, even by an Indian, is prohibited if the cigarettes are not preapproved for tax exemption”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Sentencing entrapment ... occurs when a defendant, although predisposed to commit a minor offense or lesser offense, is entrapped into committing a greater offense subject to greater punishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Police ... must be given leeway to probe the depth and extent of a criminal enterprise, to determine whether coconspirators exist, and to trace ... deeper into the distribution hierarchy.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.