Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 F.3d 154 - Johnson v. Bax

Johnson v. Bax’s Empirical Analysis

63 F.3d 154 · 1995

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2016

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

60199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Cox v. State of Louisiana · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Cox v. State of New Hampshire · Boos v. Barry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The government may regulate the use of [public forums] through appropriate, limited discretion, under properly drawn statutes or ordinances, concerning the time, place, duration, or manner of the use CT Page 12780 . . . but the government's limited discretion must be exercised uniformly and systematically so as not to create any unfair discrimination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “ha[d] no application to [the plaintiff's] cause of action, ... [because] the favorable termination of a criminal proceeding [wa]s not an essential element of an independent First Amendment claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`adjournment in contemplation of dismissal'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.