Martin v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
63 F.3d 497 · 1995
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2022
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2201 · 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395F (§ 1814 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395K (§ 1832 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395R (§ 1839 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395U (§ 1842 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Weinberger v. Salfi · Heckler v. Ringer · Bowen v. City of New York · Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any individual, after any final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security made after a hearing to which he was a party, irrespective of the amount in controversy, may obtain a review of such decision by a civil action commenced within sixty days after the mailing to him of notice of such decision or within such further time as the Commissioner of Social Security may allow. Such action shall be brought in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which the plaintiff resides.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“As a result of the 1986 Amendments ... the Michigan Academy distinctions drawn between 'amount of payment' and 'validity of the statute and regulations' challenges are no longer meaningful or necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] holding regarding the validity of that policy stands independent of the ultimate merits”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.