Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 F.3d 537 - United States v. Stalbaum

United States v. Stalbaum’s Empirical Analysis

63 F.3d 537 · 1995

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
July 2014
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably United States v. Huskey (1998), United States v. Best (2001)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

180199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 751

Relies on Rauer v. United States · North Star Steel Co. v. Thomas · Midland Central Appraisal District v. Midland Industrial Service Corp. · Baumgart v. Fairchild Aircraft Corp. · United States v. Joseph

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “What we require in the absence of a formal order of consolidation, is a showing on the record of the sentencing hearing that the sentencing judge considered the cases sufficiently related for consolidation and effectively entered one sentence for the multiple convictions.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[the defendant] has not automatically failed to carry his burden, as the government argues, simply because there was no formal order of consolidation with respect to his three misdemeanors.... the absence [of an order] is merely probative rather than conclusive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[p]rior sentences imposed in unrelated cases are to be counted separately,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.