Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 F.3d 652 - National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n v. Meyer

National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

63 F.3d 652 · 1995

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Dean Foods Company v. Ben Brancel, Secretary of the Wisconsin Dept. Of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (1999), Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey (2013)

17 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

160199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · New Jersey v. New York · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Edgar v. Mite Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all persons in that non-Wisconsin community must adhere to the Wisconsin standards whether or not they dump their waste in Wisconsin.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Wisconsin could realize its goals of conserving landfill space and protecting the environment by mandating that all waste entering the State first be treated at a material recovery facility with the capacity to effect this separation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.