Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 F.3d 745 - United States v. Wells

United States v. Wells’s Empirical Analysis

63 F.3d 745 · 1995

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2013
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2013 · most notably United States v. Wells (1997), United States v. Jobe (1996)

28 federal appellate · 1 district ·

320199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1005 · 18 U.S.C. § 1014 · 18 U.S.C. § 287 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Burks v. United States · United States v. Gaudin · California v. ARC America Corp. · Johnson v. Mississippi · Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any false statement or report ... for the purpose of influencing in any way”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the materiality issue was hotly disputed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.