Schusterman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
63 F.3d 986 · 1995
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 2501 · 26 U.S.C. § 2512 · 26 U.S.C. § 483 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno · GLK, Inc. v. United States · In re Disbarment of Alexander
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In statutory interpretation we look to the plain language of the statute and give effect to its meaning.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Quarles v. B.I.A. · In Re Slamans“We review the district court's entry of summary judgment de novo, applying the same legal standard used by the district court under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rios v. Bigler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.