Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 F.4th 102 - United States v. Abraham

United States v. Abraham’s Empirical Analysis

2023

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (§ 112 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000)

Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Duarte · Rosales-Mireles v. United States · Greer v. United States · Ohio v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) 'an error . . . (2) which was clear or obvious and which not only (3) affected [his] substantial rights, but also (4) seriously impaired the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.