Jones v. Haynes

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 22, 2003

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-05-22

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2003

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-05-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Willis Andrea Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 *731 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motion for appointment of counsel, and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Haynes, No. CA-01-393-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 8, 2003; entered Jan. 10, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3 AFFIRMED.