¶1 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2 Andre Edmonds appeals the district court’s order dismissing all claims against Elizabeth H. Paret, Clerk for the United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Moore, No. CA-02-805 (E.D.Va. Jan. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶3 AFFIRMED.
¶4 Edmonds’ claim, raised for the first time on appeal, that Paret perpetrated a fraud on the district court in her defense of this matter is not properly before this court for consideration. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993).