King v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2003
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company · Caplin v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. of New York · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. Du Bois · S. S. W., Inc. v. Air Transport Ass'n of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dechert v. Cadle Co.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.