Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 FSUPP 439 - In re Hoo

In re Hoo’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
August 1966
most recently cited

2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 1966

2 district ·

40194519501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Macintosh · Tutun v. United States · United States v. Schwimmer · Hunter v. Hunter · Brigham v. Hughson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The petitioner must, by satisfactory evidence, establish the validity of his marriage before he may acquire the valued gift of citizenship. There being no satisfactory evidence here of the dissolution of the second marriage, petitioner has not sustained the burden of proving a valid marriage as the basis of his claim to citizenship.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.