Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Idaho 552 - Gray v. Fraser

Gray v. Fraser’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2013

6 state decisions

2019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Couts v. Winston · Beckman v. Waters · Hansen v. Abrams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A fee-simple title is presumed to pass by a grant of real property, and, independent of proof, the presumption arises that the instrument is what it purports on its face to be — an absolute conveyance of the land. To justify a trial court in determining that a deed which purports to convey land absolutely in fee simple was intended to be something different, as a mortgage, the authorities are uniform to the point that the evidence must be clear, satisfactory, and convincing, and that it must appear to the court beyond reasonable controversy that it was the intention of the parties that the deed should be a mortgage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The trial court is the appropriate tribunal to weigh the evidence, and determine whether it is convincing and satisfactory, within the meaning of the rule. It has been said that in such cases, as in others, the determination of that court in favor of either party upon conflicting or contradictory evidence is not open to review in the ap'pellate court. Beckman v. Waters, 161 Cal. 581 , 119 P. 922 , quoting from Couts v. Winston, 153 Cal. 686 , 96 P. 357 , in which many earlier cases are cited.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.