Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

63 Ill. 262

Chamberlin v. McCarty

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1872

Illinois Supreme Court · decided 1872-01-15

Hatch, Esq., by consent of parties, acting as Judge. This was an action of ejectment, brought by Charles T. McCarty against Seymour Chamberlin and Frederick Salsbury, to recover of the defendants certain lands in McLean county. Upon a trial before the court, on February 8, 1870, a jury being waived, the issue was found in favor of the defendants.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1890

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1872-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam :

¶1The only question presented by this record

¶2is, whether each party to "an action of ejectment is entitled to a new trial as a matter of right.

¶3The sections in the chapter entitled “Ejectment,” should receive a liberal construction.

¶4The title to real estate is determined by the action of ejectment, and not the mere possession as formerly, and ample opportunity should be afforded to each party to exhibit his title and prove his rights.

¶5By a fair construction of the statute under consideration, it was certainly the intention of the legislature to give to each party a new trial as a matter of course, upon compliance with the statute. The intent of the statute could not be carried into effect by confining the absolute right to a new trial to one party.

¶6Such has been the construction of this statute by the courts and the profession for more than a quarter of a century, and we must give to it our assent.

¶7The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

¶8Judgment reversed.

/63/ill/262 · .json · Public domain