63 Ill. App. 3d 1039 - Eisele v. Ayers’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably 112 Ill. App. 3d 932 - Wilson v. Illinois Benedictine College (1983), 175 Ill. App. 3d 248 - Koch v. Illinois Power Co. (1988)
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 69 Ill. 2d 320 - Steinberg v. Chicago Medical School · 1 Ill. App. 3d 635 - Kraftco Corp. v. Koblus · 51 Ill. App. 3d 11 - O'Neil & Santa Claus, Ltd. v. Xtra Value Imports, Inc. · 27 Ill. App. 3d 421 - Star Finance Corp. v. McGee · Basch v. George Washington University
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The catalogues which formed the basis of the contract between the parties reserved to defendants the right to increase tuition. Nothing in the complaint indicates that defendants have exercised this right maliciously or in bad faith. In the absence of such allegations, defendants may not be coerced in the lawful exercise of their discretion.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Courts declare adhesion contracts unlawful because the party in the superior bargaining position has taken unfair advantage of the ‘adherer’ by making the desired product available only if the weaker party accedes to the form of the contract.” ( 63 Ill. App. 3d 1039, 1046 , 381 N.E.2d 27 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.