Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Ill. App. 3d 639 - Stensel v. Stensel

63 Ill. App. 3d 639 - Stensel v. Stensel’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
13
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Covey, 103 Ill. 2d 294 - First Galesburg National Bank & Trust Co. v. Joannides (1984)

4 federal appellate · 52 state decisions — followed in 13 states

460197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 8 Ill. App. 3d 789 - Tauber v. Johnson · 133 Ill. App. 2d 717 - Morris Plan Co. of Bettendorf v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unless collateral is perishable or threatens to decline speedily in value or is of a type customarily sold on a recognized market, reasonable notification of the time and place of any public sale or reasonable notification of the time after which any private sale or other intended disposition is to be made shall be sent by the secured party to the debtor, if he has not signed after default a statement renouncing or modifying his right to notification of sale.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In any other case involving consumer goods or any other collateral a secured party in possession may, after default, propose to retain the collateral in satisfaction of the obligation. Written notice of such proposal shall be sent to the debtor and except in the case of consumer goods to any other secured party who has a security interest in the collateral and who has duly filed a financing statement indexed in the name of the debtor in this state or is known by the secured party in possession to have a security interest in it. If the debtor or other person entitled to receive notification objects in writing within thirty days from the receipt of the notification or if any other secured party objects in writing within thirty days after the secured party obtains possession the secured party must dispose of the collateral under RCW 62A.9-504. In the absence of such written objection the secured party may retain the collateral in satisfaction of the debtor's obligation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.