Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Ill. App. 3d 664 - Burroughs v. McGinness

63 Ill. App. 3d 664 - Burroughs v. McGinness’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2024

24 state decisions

150197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 37 Ill. 2d 494 - Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern Railroad · 7 Ill. App. 3d 1099 - Apato v. Be Mac Transport Co. · 39 Ill. App. 3d 172 - Glenn v. Mosley · 104 Ill. App. 2d 172 - Glaze v. Owens · 46 Ill. App. 2d 409 - Barnash v. Rubovits

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In light of general experience and common knowledge, the evidence before us reveals that the defendant was not attentive while driving and therefore, negligent. A driver approaching from the rear has the duty to keep a safe lookout and he must take into consideration the fact that he may be required to stop or slow his vehicle suddenly. [Citations.] Furthermore if he does not maintain a proper lookout for traffic ahead he is negligent. [Citation.]” 63 Ill. App. 3d 664, 667 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"The evidence, even when viewed in its aspect most favorable to the defendant, clearly established defendant's negligence by his failure to be alert as to the traffic preceding him." Burroughs v. McGinness (1978), 63 Ill. App.3d 664, 669 , 380 N.E.2d 37, 40 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.