Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 INDAPP 257 - Crouch v. Fahl

Crouch v. Fahl’s Empirical Analysis

1916

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
May 1947
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 52 Ind. App. 496 - Nave v. Powell · Lee v. Fox · Oltmanns Bros. v. Poland · Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. Burch · Highsmith v. Hammonds

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court’s action in substituting the trustee in bankruptcy to prosecute the cause of action presented by the counterclaim is challenged. It is not controverted that the claim declared on by the counterclaim, if it existed, passed to the trustee by virtue of the bankruptcy proceeding. Such being the case, the trustee is the real party in interest as to such claim. The substitution, therefore, appears to have been proper.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.