Schuler v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2010
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lundberg v. Davidson · Herman v. Miller · Boyer v. Clark · Turner v. Crawford · Bartlett v. Pearson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The existence of mutual judgments does not entitle a party to have one set off against the other arbitrarily as a matter of right. Whether application for set-off is by motion or through a proceeding in equity, it is to be determined upon equitable consideration, and is only allowed when it will promote substantial justice. This was the ruling in Herman v. Miller, 17 Kan. 328 , where it was said that ‘The exercise of that power is in a measure discretionary, and it will not be exercised in cases in which it would be inequitable to do so.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Arn v. Elms
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.