Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 KAN 516 - State v. Herbert

State v. Herbert’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
March 1984
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently March 1984

1 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

40190119101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Powell · The People v. . Willett · Commonwealth v. Hayes · 35 Tex. Crim. 563 - Givens v. State · 35 Tex. Crim. 501 - Price v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ While the payment of a retainer or fee is the best evidence that the relation of attorney and client exists, such payment is not absolutely essential. If an attorney is consulted in his professional capacity, and he allows the consultation to proceed, and acts as adviser, the fact that no compensation was paid, or that the consultation was ended and the relation broken, would -not remove the seal of secrecy from the communications made.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.