State v. Shepherd’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1973
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Brown · Mitchell v. the Territory of Oklahoma · In re Mutchler · Schultz v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The guilt or innocence of appellants depends on the presence or absence of a felonious intent in their minds at any time while in the possession of the saddle to deprive the owner permanently of his property and convert it to their own use. As was said by Chief Justice Horton, in In re Mutchler, Petitioner, 55 Kan. 164 , 40 Pac. 283 : ‘A felonious intent means to deprive the owner, not temporarily, but permanently, of his own property, without color of right or excuse for the act, and to convert it to the taker’s use without the consent of the owner.’ (See, also, Schultz v. The State, 30 Tex. App. 94, 16 S. W. 756 ; Mitchell et al. v. The Territory of Oklahoma, 7 Okla. 527 , 54 Pac. 782 ; People v. Brown, 105 Cal. 66 , 38 Pac. 518 .)” (p. 547.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Goldsberry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.