Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 KAN 682 - Prest v. Black

Prest v. Black’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
states following
May 1971
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1971

9 state decisions

3019011910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holloway v. McIlhenny Co. · Hutchinson v. Hutchinson · Dugan v. Follett · 58 Mo. App. 562 - Walton v. Yore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is undeniable that only such conveyances or other grants as are in the record chain of title are constructive notice to subsequent purchasers or encumbrancers. The registering of a deed or will by a stranger to the record chain does not impart notice to any one.” (p. 684.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.