Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 MICH 487 - Williams v. Flood

Williams v. Flood’s Empirical Analysis

1886

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
13
states following
October 1947
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 1947 · most notably C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. Daffin (1906), Shepard v. Mount Vernon Lumber Co. (1915)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 13 states

1101886189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Owens v. Lewis · Abell v. Munson · Putney v. Day · Russell v. Myers · Daniels v. Bailey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not very important to discuss the exact nature of plaintiff's rights under the written contract. Whatever they were, they included an absolute sale of all the Umber described, subject only to such qualifications of the right of removal as the contract mentions. At most, this condition would only operate by way of forfeiture. The timber had all been paid for, and all belongc>d to plaintiff, unless lost by that forfeiture for nonremovaJL””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If the interest of the vendee in the standing timber would cease at the expiration of the time limited in the contract for its removal, the effect of the extension would be to grant a new or further interest in the land,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.