63 Mich. App. 241 - People v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ * * * ‘We deal here rather with judicial revocation of probation where procedures and processes differ and where a decision is made by the repository of “due process” — the courts.’ Moore v. Stamps, 507 S.W.2d 939, 951 (Mo.App.1974). We hold that Michigan’s judicial warrant procedure coupled with the strict due process requirements of the revocation hearing is constitutionally equal or superior to the preliminary ‘minimal inquiry’ hearing and final revocation hearing procedure required by Morrissey and Gagnon.” 234 N.W.2d at 471 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Knobel v. State

2. ““(1) does the failure to afford a defendant a preliminary hearing on his probation violation mandate an automatic reversal[?]” 234 N.W.2d at 469 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Knobel v. State