63 N.C. App. 644 - Walker v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
September 1998
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crosby v. Crosby · Fuchs v. Fuchs · Williams v. Williams · In Re the Ad Valorem Valuation of Property of Pine Raleigh Corp. · Coggins v. Coggins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a wife petitions the judge to increase the amount which the Court itself has previously fixed for the support of minor children, she assumes the burden of showing that cir cumstances have changed between the time of the order and the time of the hearing upon the petition for increase .... However, ... in this case, the defendant’s support payments for the children had been made pursuant to the terms of a deed of separation which was in no way binding on the court insofar as it applied to the children. Therefore, plaintiff s only burden was to show the amount reasonably required for the support of the children at the time of the hearing. The amount which the parties fixed . . . was merely evidence for the judge to consider, along with all the other evidence in the case, in determining a reasonable amount for support of the children.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.