Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

63 Neb. 436

Snyder v. Rogers

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1902

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1902-01-08

<p>Decision of Trial Court: Preponderance oe Evidence: Review. A decision of the trial court based upon competent evidence, not intrinsically improbable, will be sustained, even though, the 'reviewing- court may think the preponderance of the evidence is opposed to the conclusion reached.</p>

Affirmed · Decided 1902-01-08

Sullivan, J.

¶1Tu this case there is involved only a question of fact. The evidence is about evenly balanced. That supporting the theory of the defendant in error, although not entirely satisfactory, is not intrinsically improbable; and hence, under the settled practice in this court, the decision of the trial court can not be disturbed. No possible benefit'could accrue to the parties or the profession from a presentation and discussion of the evidence, and we therefore content ourselves with an announcement of the conclusion at which we have arrived.

¶2The judgment is

¶3Affirmed.

/63/neb/436 · .json · Public domain