Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Nev. 118 - State v. McKay

State v. McKay’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2017 · most notably Deck v. Missouri (2005), Odell v. Hudspeth (1951)

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

15019461950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Woodward v. Leavitt · Commonwealth v. Millen · McDonald v. United States · State v. Williams · People v. Harrington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`At that time I knew that the defendant had previously been convicted of burglary, had served a term in the Utah penitentiary, had deserted from the armed forces of the United States, had been sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment, had escaped from a military guard house, had registered in Reno under an assumed name, and had attempted to escape from the Washoe County jail. I had also been advised that while in the Washoe County jail the defendant had attempted to procure some hack saws in order to escape therefrom, at the time stating, in effect, that he could not secure his liberty legally. I had also been advised that the Sheriff and his deputies actually believed it necessary to keep the defendant handcuffed in Court in order to prevent his attempting to escape.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “fanciful right to play upon the sympathy or credulity of the jurors, and * * * to endeavor to have them depart from their sworn duty, and thereby defeat justice, and of which the handcuffing may have rendered him less capable, * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “could not logically negative the idea that prejudice may have influenced the jurors, since there is no conceivable yardstick in the law to judge the degree of prejudice in the minds of the jurors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.