Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 NJEQ 96 - Moore v. Durnam

Moore v. Durnam’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
4
states following
July 1974
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 1974

12 state decisions

6019021910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hansbrough v. Peck · Lawrence v. . Miller · Green v. Green · Donahue v. Parkman · Woodbury v. Turner, Manufacturing Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule is entirely settled that a part payment of the purchase money cannot be recovered by a purchaser if he causelessly refuses to execute his contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.