Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 N.J. Super. 188 - State v. Murphy

63 N.J. Super. 188 - State v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1961
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Frank v. Mangum · Moore v. Dempsey · Bowman Dairy Co. v. United States · Cicenia v. Lagay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`What we have said has its roots much deeper than mere niceties of procedure or so-called technicalities of the law of evidence. The most fundamental of a reviewing court's duties is to see to it both that the end result in a case is just and correct and that the means utilized are fair and proper. Such is the essence of due process of law.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “every reasonable opportunity and facility within the rules for the preparation of their defense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Obviously * * * the parent of R.R. 3:5-10 is not a discovery rule,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.