Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 N.M. 121 - Huff v. Dunaway

Huff v. Dunaway’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
April 1996
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 1996

22 state decisions

14019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murray's Case · Burruss v. B. M. C. Logging Co. · De Palma v. Weinman · Bland v. Greenfield Gin Co. · Jones v. George F. Getty Oil Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The employee renders personal service. The independent contractor may or may not. In both cases, the employer exercises authority. Beyond doubt the character of' such authority or control is the usual and generally accepted test. The result to be achieved by the independent contractor is controlled by the employer. But, when the control descends to the details or to the means and methods of performance, we have a servant or employee. * * ■ * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * The employment in Dunham v. Billy Walker takes on the character of a ‘borrowing’ by the Holmes Drilling Company of an employee of Walker to assist in a’ work foreign to the engagement that had brought him there.' This' factor injects an element of choice, of voluntariness, on the part of the ‘borrowed’ employee, so desirable in a transaction of this kind. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““ * * * what in many cases are considered satisfactory tests, in other cases and under different circumstances, are not satisfactory. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.