State v. Begay’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
1 district · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2009
1 district · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 25 U.S.C. § 311
Relies on Johnson Graham's v. William M'Intosh · Beecher v. Wetherby · State v. Tucker · Veeder v. Guppy · In Re FREDENBERG
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We hold that the authority under which the State was permitted to construct Highway 666 through, and over, the Navajo Indian reservation failed ' to extinguish the title of the Navajo Indian Tribe.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the generic term for a `liberty, privilege, right or advantage which one has in the land of another.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Crowder
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.