Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 NY2D 105 - In re Reeves

In re Reeves’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
6
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2002

19 state decisions

100198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he purpose of judicial disciplinary proceedings is `not punishment but the imposition of sanctions where necessary to safeguard the Bench from unfit incumbents'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “repeated pattern of failing to advise litigants of their constitutional and statutory rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.