63 N.Y.2d 615
Decided July 3, 1984
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1984-07-03
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“any statutory, regulatory or precedential right to his prison job.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Gill v. Mooney
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-07-03
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2014
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1OPINION OF THE COURT
¶2On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs. Petitioner has failed to show any statutory, regulatory or precedential right to his prison job. Accordingly, no proceeding lies for its termination in the absence of proof of denial of constitutional right or statutory violation.
¶3Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.