Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

63 Ohio App. 3d 121

577 N.E.2d 1184

In Re Lambert

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1989

Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1989-10-02

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently August 2006

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-10-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Harsha, Judge,

¶1 concurring.

¶2 I concur in the judgment and opinion and write only to note that the appellee failed to file a brief in this matter. Because appellant’s assignment of error and brief were far from being frivolous, appellee took a substantial risk that the application of App.R. 18(C) would result in a reversal.

/63/ohioapp3d/121 · .json · Public domain