Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 Ohio App. 3d 178 - Hunt v. Hunt

63 Ohio App. 3d 178 - Hunt v. Hunt’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2022

11 state decisions

5019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blakemore v. Blakemore · 29 Ohio App. 2d 55 - Glimcher v. Glimcher · 111 Ohio App. 432 - Kennedy v. Kennedy · 112 Ohio App. 259 - Ginn v. Ginn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as used in Section 11979, General Code, is not limited in scope to acts of physical violence or the reasonable apprehension thereof, but is sufficiently broad to encompass acts and conduct the effect of which is calculated to permanently destroy the peace of mind and happiness of one of the parties to the marriage and thereby render the marital relation intolerable. (Facts and Law at 4.) {¶ 21} The phrase”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that vest[s] the finder of facts with broad discretion to determine whether the particular evidence of marital misconduct rises to the level of * * * extreme cruelty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[g]ross neglect of duty is the failure of one party to perform a marital duty attended by circumstances of indignity or aggravation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.