63 Ohio App. 3d 790 - State v. Boyd’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably 126 Ohio App. 3d 614 - State v. Scalf (1998), 169 Ohio St. 3d 279 - State v. McAlpin (2022)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Dehass · United States v. Harris · State v. Eley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Possess' or `possession' means having control over a thing or substance, but may not be inferred solely from mere access to the thing or substance through ownership or occupation of the premises upon which the thing or substance is found.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage““Statements made by a trial judge during the progress of a trial and within hearing of the jury are of the same effect as though embodied in the charge to the jury, and, where such remarks or questioning may lend themselves to being interpreted as an opinion on the part of the judge as to the credibility of witnesses or of a defendant or an opinion on his part as to the facts of the case, prejudicial error results. * * *””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“At the suppression hearing, Officer Rongers testified that he relied upon Randy Miller's admission that Boyd supplied him with drugs in exchange for stolen property. In limited circumstances, such a statement against a declarant's penal interest may support a finding of probable cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mendoza
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.