Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 OHIOMISC 17 - State v. Osborn

State v. Osborn’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2005

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

40198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Mapp v. Ohio · Simmons v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To extend the scope of a legitimate intrusion to the seizure of evidence that the officers knew in advance they would `find in plain view and intended to seize, would fly in the face of the basic rule that no amount of probable cause can justify a warrantless seizure.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.