Pasqualone v. Pasqualone’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

65 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““(A) A court of this state shall not exercise its jurisdiction, if at the time of filing the petition a parenting proceeding concerning the child was pending in a court of another state exercising jurisdiction substantially in conformity with sections 3109.21 to 3109.36 of the Revised Code, unless the proceeding is stayed by the court of the other state because this state is a more appropriate forum or for other reasons.””

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 12 Ohio App. 3d 138 - Squires v. Squires · 118 Ohio App. 3d 622 - In Re Simons

2. ““(1) Whether the party has participated as a party, witness or in any other capacity in any other litigation concerning the custody of the same child in this or any other state;' “(2) Whether the party has information of any custody proceeding concerning the child pending in a court of this or any other state; “(3) Whether the party knows of any person not a party to the proceedings who has physical custody of the child or claims to have custody or visitation rights with respect to the child.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 113 Ohio App. 3d 580 - In Re Porter · Harris v. Harris

3. “in the absence of an agreement or binding court order parents have equal rights to custody of their children.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Waliser v. Tada · State v. Ondic, Unpublished Decision (5-6-2005)