(1974)’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View · Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of Wisconsin · 26 Wis. 2d 587 - Josam Manufacturing Co. v. State Board of Health · 52 Wis. 2d 351 - State Ex Rel. Farrell v. Schubert · Clintonville Transfer Line, Inc. v. Public Service Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]t is important to understand that administrative rules cannot create power but are made in the exercise of power given by the legislature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.