Durrah v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc. v. Blankenship · Yates v. Gober · Texas v. Cobb · 94 Wash. 2d 359 - Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc. · 100 Wash. 2d 853 - Chaplin v. Sanders
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“guarantees the right to a jury trial in common law actions for ejectment, but not in equitable actions to quiet title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. Hooper“guaranteeing those rights to trial by jury which existed at the time of the adoption of the constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. Hooper“`the court, as it always has done, may call a jury to try out that question.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wynn v. Earin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.