Dalton v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Phillips · McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood · 123 Wash. 2d 296 - Matter of Personal Restraint of Lord · Drury v. Franke · 114 Wash. 2d 77 - State v. Rempel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the existence of a state of mind on the part of the juror in reference to the action, or to either party, which satisfies the court that the challenged person cannot try the issue impartially and without prejudice to the substantial rights of the party challenging.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kuhn v. Schall“[The juror] told me that he thought that Casey Dalton was an opportunist trying to profit from her child's death.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dalton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.