Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 SO2D 176 - Briley v. Jones

Briley v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1962
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 50 So. 2d 321 - Gauthier v. Fogleman · Wheat v. Brandt · Allen v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co. of New York · 6 So. 2d 96 - Phillips v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Whether or not the Jones car was brought to a stop at the intersection with the right-of-way thoroughfare is of no controlling importance. The fact that it proceeded into the intersection even at a low rate of speed, which we think is belied by the evidence of a terrific impact reflected in the photographs, and struck the car which had preempted the intersection, must unquestionably be resolved as an act of negligence which was the proximate cause of the collision and as a consequence renders defendant liable in damages."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.