¶1The decree is affirmed so far as it dismissed the discretionary decree of specific performance and that part of it providing for a judgment is also affirmed because it is not attacked by cross assignment of error; but the right is reserved to the appellant to sue for the installments prescribed in the deed of trust mentioned in the agreement of the parties dated June 11, 1946, and not included in the judgment.
63 So. 2d 194
Jonas v. Hudson
Decided February 17, 1953
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1953-02-17
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1958
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1953-02-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →