Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 63 So. 2d 631 - Lambert v. Higgins

63 So. 2d 631 - Lambert v. Higgins’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
December 1981
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1981

16 state decisions

901953196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ryan v. Noble · Wall v. Little · Rosenberg v. Coman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"There is a very delicate balance to be maintained in cases of this kind to protect both the interest of the plaintiff and defendant. Ordinarily the trial Judge is in the best position to do this and, unless there is a clear abuse of his authority shown, we are not inclined to interfere with the result of the trial on this ground."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “gross negligence and wilful and wanton misconduct”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.