Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

63 So. 3d 130

In re Marchand

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 17, 2011

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2011-06-17

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2018

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-06-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

¶2The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent neglected a legal matter and failed to communicate with a client. Thereafter, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Charmaine L. Marchand, Louisiana Bar Roll number 26986, be publicly reprimanded.

¶4IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.

¶5 Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.

/63/so3d/130 · .json · Public domain