Putnam v. Epps’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 669 So. 2d 44 - Williams v. State · 915 So. 2d 508 - Guy v. State · Putnam v. Epps · 966 So. 2d 839 - Horton v. Epps
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Civil actions of which the circuit court has original jurisdiction shall be commenced in the county where the defendant resides, or, if a corporation, in the county of its principal place of business, or in the county where a substantial alleged act or omission occurred or where a substantial event that caused the injury occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.