63 So. 3d 589 - Howard v. Gunnell’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hoffman v. Celebrezze · 753 So. 2d 1057 - McNeil v. Hester · 451 So. 2d 219 - Stringfellow v. Stringfellow · Domenico Mastini v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company and Western Electric Company, Domenico Mastini v. New York Telephone Company · Perkins v. Perkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) fraud, misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (2) accident or mistake; (3) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judg ment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; (6) any other reason justifying relief from the judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.